Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
  • EN
  • FR
  • DE
  • £
  • €
  • $
© 2016 FDRIO | Privacy Policy | Refund & Cancellation Policy
Member Login
FDRIO
0
Cart: $0.00

No products in the cart.

  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
Family Dispute Resolution, FDRIO in the News, News & Updates

Court Upholds Confidentiality of Mediation Intake Forms, Mediator’s File and Screening Notes: (Retired Justice) Cliff Nelson & Hilary Linton

Posted on January 16, 2019 at 1:27 pm / 0

by, Cliff Nelson, Riverdale Mediation & Hilary Linton, Riverdale Mediation and mediate393/311/47

Few legal principles are more sacrosanct than settlement privilege. In family law, where the legal, emotional and physical safety of family mediation is directly connected to its effectiveness, the principle is even more important. And the most sacred of all parts of a family law file are the notes generated by the mediator in what is known as the screening process and the confidential intake forms completed by clients to initiate it.

Screening is the mandatory first step undertaken by professionally certified family mediators. It is a confidential meeting between each client and the mediator to assess whether the key principles of family mediation— a voluntary, informed process of self-determination that does no harm— can be met in the particular case. Its importance for an effective, fair and safe mediation cannot be understated. It is a long- established best practice endorsed by every Canadian professional mediation organization.

Screening is “super-confidential”. It is covered not only by the three-way confidentiality provisions between the mediator and the parties, but also by a specific agreement whereby each party undertakes to not seek production of any screening information relating to the other party. The reasoning for this is self-evident: screening relates to issues of power imbalance including intimate partner violence and, in cases involving risk, disclosure of this information could jeopardize the safety of a party or child. There is no case where a court has compelled disclosure of screening notes or intake forms and for good reason.

Screening is what enables mediators to design negotiations that meet the needs of each client. After screening, a confidential mediation will take place, unless the parties have signed an Agreement to Mediate that provides otherwise. Everything that happens in the mediation process is confidential, as are all intake forms, notes, documents and draft mediation reports.  The only exceptions are where a child is in need of protection, a person’s safety is at risk, or otherwise in accordance with the law.

This is mediation 101.

So it was (very) surprising to see that in December (Benson v Kitt, 2018 ONSC 7552) , a client tried to compel production of the file, including the intake forms and the mediator’s notes from the screening process, of a senior Toronto family mediator*.

Predictably and thankfully, the court made short work of this argument.

The issue to be resolved on a motion before P.J. Monahan, J had to do with compelling a wife to answer questions she had refused to answer when she was being questioned at a special examiner’s office.

As part of the questioning, the husband asked the wife to produce an earlier mediation file, together with the mediation intake form. That mediation concerned issues of child support. As a result of the mediation, the parties entered into minutes of settlement, which were to be incorporated into an amending separation agreement. However, circumstances arose that seem to have prevented that from occurring.

It is not necessary, for this article, to set out any other facts of the case here; suffice it to say that the case “exploded” to the point that senior family law lawyers on both sides continued a robust litigation war.

As part of this battle, the respondent husband made the request for the mediation file, mediation intake form and screening notes of the mediator.

In refusing to order the documents requested by the husband, P. J. Monahan, J stressed that the concept of settlement privilege, which arises in common law, protects confidential communications between spouses when they are trying to settle a dispute.

The policy behind this concept is to give each party the confidence to know and understand that they can speak freely and without fear of legal consequence during a private mediation (or, for that matter, during a private negotiation, as long as the goal is to arrive at a settlement).

Equally important in this case was the fact that the mediator had the foresight to have both parties sign a mediation agreement containing a confidentiality clause. This contractual provision made it quite clear that the mediation process was private, and that any disclosure of the mediation file would be inadmissible in a court or arbitration. The clients each specifically acknowledged that intake forms and screening process is confidential between the mediator and that client.

Notwithstanding this confidentiality clause, the husband’s counsel argued that the negotiations were only inadmissible “to the extent permitted by law ” , as that phrase appears in the clause. Counsel submitted that there was some ambiguity to the agreement, arguing that this phrase suggested that the parties contemplated disclosure of the very materials the respondent was requesting.

The judge gave this argument short shrift, stating:

In my view, the words “to the extent permitted by law” suggest precisely the opposite,

namely that disclosure obtained during the mediation shall be inadmissible unless

there is some positive legal requirement for disclosure.

As none was identified, the ruling went against the husband.

In a perfect world, Justice Monahan would have gone further and specifically acknowledged the critical importance of maintaining the “super-confidentiality” of intake forms and screening notes, as this topic clearly continues to befuddle some.

It is comforting to know that settlement privilege at a mediation remains protected. Even so, a mediator will want to ensure a comfortable night’s sleep by having a signed contract in place.

 

*For the purposes of full disclosure, the senior Family mediator is an Associate at Riverdale Mediation.

was last modified: May 7th, 2019 by Tricia Wong
Cliff NelsonElizabeth Hydefamily courtFamily LawFamily MediationHilary Lintonmediation confidentialityRiverdale Mediationscreening for domestic violence
Share Post
Previous
From the FDRIO Conference: Indigenous Peoples Often Prefer to Deal with Conflict Resolution Within Own Communities
Next
From the FDRIO Conference: Workplaces Need Inclusive Leaders to Break Through Implicit Bias

Related posts

News & Updates

FDRIO’s Annual General Meeting

December 2, 2020 at 2:50 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Our Chair, Neil Maisel, opened up the meeting with a summary of the exceptional year we have had – including the entertaining humour we’ve all come to expect of Neil! FDRIO has, despite the pandemic, had an unexpected good year, a welcomed success considering the world changed back in March: Our membership increased by 25% because of the highly regarded events and programs we offer our members. We plan to continue on this trajectory for the year ahead! Our innovative unConference was moved to a virtual event offering an excellent program that was very well attended. We hosted a Town Hall open to all family dispute resolution…

was last modified: December 2nd, 2020 by Tricia Wong
FDR Updates, News & Updates

FDRIO Response to Family Legal Services Provider Licence

December 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

The Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released a consultation paper on a proposed licensing model for a Family Legal Services Provider (FLSP) licence and invited stakeholders to provide comment.  Over the past 4 months, a committee of FDRIO members has been meeting to analyze the proposed model and form an informed and comprehensive response from FDRIO.  We are thankful to the members of the committee who gave their time, energy and expertise to ensure that the response from FDRIO was representative of our membership.  The FDRIO submission is posted on the website and can be accessed here. was last modified:…

was last modified: December 2nd, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Cliff’s Notes: The Importance of Screening for Intimate Partner Abus

November 4, 2020 at 12:30 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Every time I write these “Notes” I often find several cases on which I might comment, but I can only cover a few. This time, I have chosen to focus on just one case because of its importance to the work we do. The Importance of Screening for Intimate Partner Abus On July 21, 2020, the Discipline Committee of the Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers released a decision about a social worker who failed to properly screen for intimate partner abuse. The decision is reported as Ontario College of Social Workers v. S. 2020 On first…

was last modified: November 4th, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Case Law Review: Moore v Sweet and Life Insurance: Implications for Family Dispute Resolution Professionals

November 4, 2020 at 11:30 am by Tricia Wong / 0

For many Canadians, whether the purpose is to fund payment of anticipated estate liabilities, to assist in the financial support of one’s dependants, to honour support payment obligations, to equalize the distribution of an estate between multiple children, or to provide a direct benefit to one or more designated beneficiaries, life insurance policies represent an important component of an estate plan. If the beneficiary designation of a policy cannot be honoured following the insured’s death, this may result in the complete frustration of his or her testamentary wishes and prevent the estate plan from being implemented in the manner that…

was last modified: November 4th, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Book Review “Intensive Mothering: The Cultural Contradictions of Modern Motherhood” (Demeter Press)

November 3, 2020 at 4:52 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Dr. Linda Ennis, who is moderating a panel on “Differentiating Between Coaches & Mental Health Professionals” at the upcoming FDRIO conference, shares one of her books with us today on “intensive mothering”. She will be offering an online course on this subject on Dec 10th-11th, which will elaborate upon how it impacts the parenting process throughout marriage and divorce (drlindaennis.com). It is recommended that this book on intensive mothering be read in conjunction with her book entitled “After the Happily Ever After: Empowering Women & Mothers In Relationships” (Demeter Press) to fully understand the role of mothers and parents in…

was last modified: November 3rd, 2020 by Tricia Wong

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  • FDRIO Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Help & FAQ

Copyright 2017 FDRIO

Search engine

Use this form to find things you need on this site