Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
  • EN
  • FR
  • DE
  • £
  • €
  • $
© 2016 FDRIO | Privacy Policy | Refund & Cancellation Policy
Member Login
FDRIO
0
Cart: $0.00

No products in the cart.

  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
Family Dispute Resolution, FDR Updates, News & Updates

Having Two Lawyers on a File – is it a justifiable expense?

Posted on May 7, 2019 at 2:07 pm / 0

by Retired Justice, Cliff Nelson as part of “Cliff’s Notes” a feature in FDRIO’s newsletter

This month, I am going to refer to two cases: one from the Ontario Court of Appeal, the other from the Superior Court of Justice. Neither case is of particular importance (except, of course, to the parties themselves) nor do they have much precedent value. However, I still think it is worth bringing them to your attention for reasons that will become apparent.

We all know that litigation costs are beyond the reach of the majority of our citizens. Time and again, we have heard repeated the fact that our courts are available to the very poor (Legal Aid) and the very rich. The majority of the middle class can, however, simply not afford to litigate. That is one reason why mediation services have grown exponentially.

The cases are Marchese v. Marchese 2019 ONCA 116 and Malik v. Malik 2019 ONSC 1217. Both deal with the issue of costs. Both deny the full amount of requested costs by a successful party who had used both a senior and a junior lawyer on the file. In Marchese, the Court of Appeal finds little merit in the appeal, stating that the matter did not require two counsel. In fact, the Court even denied the successful respondent costs for the new counsel to cover work done to get up to speed.

In Malik, the Court states that just because a party achieves success does not mean that the party is entitled to “whatever” costs were incurred. In this case, costs to the successful party, for the services of two lawyers, were reduced. A senior lawyer, with 27 years of experience, and a junior lawyer, with 7 years of experience, worked on the file. Both appeared on the motion. The Court found that much of the time docketed showed both lawyers working together at the same time and on the same date. The Court pointed out that the costs motion was one that could have been taken by the junior lawyer alone. The case certainly did not require two lawyers.

Of course, the rationale for having two (or more) lawyers on a file is that some services can be provided at a lower cost by the lawyer with less experience. The lesson here is that, in the majority of cases, one should be leery of having two lawyers appear together. At today’s rates, one lawyer is expensive enough! Having said this, there is no hard and fast rule. Some complex cases do require more than one lawyer for a party. The Court is always concerned about the concepts of “reasonableness” and “proportionality” when dealing with costs. Arbitrators and counsel should, however, be aware that, even when successful, a client might be deprived of costs for two lawyers if the case does not justify the expense.

Until next time,

Cliff

was last modified: May 7th, 2019 by Tricia Wong
arbitration processarbitratorCliff NelsonJustice Cliff NelsonMalik v Malik 2019 ONSC 1217Marchese v Marchese 2019 ONCA 116
Share Post
Previous
Is Arbitration Right for Every Case?
Next
Attachment in Family Mediation

Related posts

News & Updates

FDRIO’s Annual General Meeting

December 2, 2020 at 2:50 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Our Chair, Neil Maisel, opened up the meeting with a summary of the exceptional year we have had – including the entertaining humour we’ve all come to expect of Neil! FDRIO has, despite the pandemic, had an unexpected good year, a welcomed success considering the world changed back in March: Our membership increased by 25% because of the highly regarded events and programs we offer our members. We plan to continue on this trajectory for the year ahead! Our innovative unConference was moved to a virtual event offering an excellent program that was very well attended. We hosted a Town Hall open to all family dispute resolution…

was last modified: December 2nd, 2020 by Tricia Wong
FDR Updates, News & Updates

FDRIO Response to Family Legal Services Provider Licence

December 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

The Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released a consultation paper on a proposed licensing model for a Family Legal Services Provider (FLSP) licence and invited stakeholders to provide comment.  Over the past 4 months, a committee of FDRIO members has been meeting to analyze the proposed model and form an informed and comprehensive response from FDRIO.  We are thankful to the members of the committee who gave their time, energy and expertise to ensure that the response from FDRIO was representative of our membership.  The FDRIO submission is posted on the website and can be accessed here. was last modified:…

was last modified: December 2nd, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Cliff’s Notes: The Importance of Screening for Intimate Partner Abus

November 4, 2020 at 12:30 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Every time I write these “Notes” I often find several cases on which I might comment, but I can only cover a few. This time, I have chosen to focus on just one case because of its importance to the work we do. The Importance of Screening for Intimate Partner Abus On July 21, 2020, the Discipline Committee of the Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers released a decision about a social worker who failed to properly screen for intimate partner abuse. The decision is reported as Ontario College of Social Workers v. S. 2020 On first…

was last modified: November 4th, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Case Law Review: Moore v Sweet and Life Insurance: Implications for Family Dispute Resolution Professionals

November 4, 2020 at 11:30 am by Tricia Wong / 0

For many Canadians, whether the purpose is to fund payment of anticipated estate liabilities, to assist in the financial support of one’s dependants, to honour support payment obligations, to equalize the distribution of an estate between multiple children, or to provide a direct benefit to one or more designated beneficiaries, life insurance policies represent an important component of an estate plan. If the beneficiary designation of a policy cannot be honoured following the insured’s death, this may result in the complete frustration of his or her testamentary wishes and prevent the estate plan from being implemented in the manner that…

was last modified: November 4th, 2020 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Book Review “Intensive Mothering: The Cultural Contradictions of Modern Motherhood” (Demeter Press)

November 3, 2020 at 4:52 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Dr. Linda Ennis, who is moderating a panel on “Differentiating Between Coaches & Mental Health Professionals” at the upcoming FDRIO conference, shares one of her books with us today on “intensive mothering”. She will be offering an online course on this subject on Dec 10th-11th, which will elaborate upon how it impacts the parenting process throughout marriage and divorce (drlindaennis.com). It is recommended that this book on intensive mothering be read in conjunction with her book entitled “After the Happily Ever After: Empowering Women & Mothers In Relationships” (Demeter Press) to fully understand the role of mothers and parents in…

was last modified: November 3rd, 2020 by Tricia Wong

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  • FDRIO Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Help & FAQ

Copyright 2017 FDRIO

Search engine

Use this form to find things you need on this site