Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
  • EN
  • FR
  • DE
  • £
  • €
  • $
© 2016 FDRIO | Privacy Policy | Refund & Cancellation Policy
Member Login
FDRIO
0
Cart: $0.00

No products in the cart.

  • Home
  • About
    • What is FDRIO?
    • Our Board
    • Our Founders
    • FDRIO Standards
    • FDRIO’s Complaints Policy
      • Complaints Policy
    • Sections
      • Overview
      • Academic & Policy
      • Arbitration
      • Coaches & Consultants
      • Estates & Elder
      • Family Violence Section (FVS)
      • Financial
      • Mediation
      • Parenting Coordination
    • Contact Us
  • Search for a Professional
  • News
    • FDRIO in the News
    • FDR Updates
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • FDRIO Conference 2020
      • Prior Conferences
        • -2019-
        • -2018-
        • -2017-
        • -2016-
    • FDRIO Unconference 2020
      • Prior Unconferences
        • -2018-
        • -2016-
    • FDRweek
      • What is FDR Week?
      • FDR Week 2019
      • Past FDR Weeks
        • FDR Week 2018
          • FDRIO Founders
        • FDR Week 2016
        • FDR Week 2015
  • Designations
    • General
    • FDRP Arb
      • Family Arbitration Screening Guidelines
    • Roster for Qualified Arbitration Screeners
    • FDRP Med
      • Family Mediation Screening Guidelines
    • FDRP PC
      • FDRP PC Designation Requirements
      • PC Screening Guidelines
      • PC Standards of Practice
    • Certificate in Online DR
  • Courses & Training
    • Course Approval Requirements
      • Application for Course Approval
      • Screening for Power Imbalances & Family Violence (21 hrs)
      • Family Law (30 hrs)
      • Family Relations (14 hrs)
      • Basic Family Mediation Theory & Skills (40 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Theory & Skills (21 hrs)
      • Advanced Family Mediation Practicum (21 hrs)
      • Basic Parenting Coordination (14 hrs)
      • Advanced Parenting Coordination Practicum (14 hrs)
      • Arbitration Law and Skills (40 hrs)
    • Approved Courses
    • Internships
      • Guidance to Mediation Mediator-in-Training Supervisors
      • Guidance to Parenting Coordination Mediator-In-Training Supervisors
  • Join
    • Join FDRIO Now
    • Why Join FDRIO?
    • Check our Member Benefits
  • Member Login
FDR Updates, News & Updates

Court Orders In-Person School Attendance

Posted on September 10, 2020 at 2:12 pm / 0

On August 25, 2020, newly minted Justice the Honourable Andrea Himel faced a question on the minds of many parents – should a nine-year-old boy attend school or continue online learning at home?

The parents of the child, W. C., were both working at home, and there were no other children in their households. The partner of the father is working in an essential service position in the community. There are no underlying medical conditions for anyone in either household, and W.C. is a generally healthy child.

Himel J. had some wisdom to impart to the parents calling the urgency of the motion a “self-fulfilling prophecy”, because the parties had not availed themselves of settlement options short of court. She says “A better approach is to engage in mediation with a professional or third-party trusted family member or friend…. I note that in this case (and in all others currently before the Court) the Mother and Father have delegated the authority to make the decision respecting their child’s in-person versus online attendance at school to me, a judge who has never met the parents and who will likely never meet the child. I would encourage the parents to return to mediation as this is a process that empowers them to make these important decisions.

Her Honour ordered the child to attend school in person, after reviewing the evidence presented by the parents and the caselaw (primarily from Quebec) about school attendance.  She states that health officials are better placed to assess the risk of school attendance than a judge. But she also lays the groundwork for a different result on different facts.  She reviews the indicia of risk presented by the father and discusses why they do not change her result.

(a)  None of the adults nor W.C. have any underlying medical conditions that make any of them particularly susceptible to adverse effects of COVID-19; 

(b)  While the [step-mother] is scheduled to have ankle surgery at some unknown date in the future, her medical vulnerability will be relatively short-lived, and can be addressed by a temporary change or suspension of the Father’s in-person parenting time (and/or a change to socially distanced time in the community), with the addition of virtual access. W.C. can undergo COVID-19 testing to ensure that he is healthy prior to the return to the usual schedule; 

(c)  The likelihood that the [step-mother] may need to travel to Ohio to visit her elderly mother, who is in chronic poor health, and possibly return with her to Ontario, is not quantifiable. Such a plan may not be feasible given the current status of the border, the two-week quarantine, and other obstacles. It is unreasonable to withhold W.C. from school, “just in case”, and the paternal step-grandmother’s potential needs should not trump the child’s; 

(d) The [Step-mother] continues to work outside of the home providing an essential service. While the Father works from home, when he is out in the community and in an indoor space, he always encounters at least one person who is non-compliant with the mandatory mask and social distancing rules. Therefore, any and all members of the Father’s household could be exposed to COVID-19 in their daily lives. 

(e)  The Father is worried about the impact of wearing a mask at school as it may affect his son’s education. A mask makes it harder to communicate clearly and read facial cues, which may impede the development of W.C.s oral skills in French. However, this is not a risk that warrants online learning. 

(f)  The guilt W.C. may feel if he believes he has infected a family member with COVID-19 (which is another of the Father’s concerns), can be addressed by the Mother, the Father, and [step-mother], assuring him that people catch viruses from many places, and that he is not responsible; and 

(g)  The fear expressed by W.C. about returning to school until it is safe can be minimized through messages that support the Court’s decision, coupled with reassurances that the Ontario government will continue to monitor risk and take appropriate steps to protect children. 

was last modified: September 10th, 2020 by Tricia Wong
arbitrationCourt Orders In-Person School Attendancefamily dispute resolutionFamily LawFDRIOJustice Andrea HimelMediator
Share Post
Previous
Mediation Internships – Tips for New Candidates; Opportunities for Supervisors
Next
What’s Going on in The Family Courts?

Related posts

News & Updates

Article–Seeking Supervisors for the Mediators-In-Training (MIT)

February 25, 2021 at 3:05 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

The journey to becoming a certified family mediator can be a cumbersome process. A main obstacle that aspiring family mediators come across is securing an internship to complete the required 100 hours of practical experience. With the growth of the family mediation profession, there is increased demand for aspiring Mediator-In-Training (MIT) supervisors. While there are organizations that offer internships to MITs, the waitlists can be long and it can take over a year to start the process. We want to help reduce this limbo period by encouraging family mediator professionals to offer supervision to MITs and help them complete their…

was last modified: February 25th, 2021 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

The Top 10 Things FDR Professionals Should Know About Death and Capacity

February 24, 2021 at 7:07 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

From time to time all lawyers and other professionals assisting families will encounter situations where a client or another party to a proceeding begins to suffer from capacity issues or dies while matters remain unresolved.  Litigants can and do die in the midst of legal proceedings and while separation or divorce proceedings, custody disputes, and disputes regarding support are being resolved.  We also frequently see issues previously addressed during separation or divorce negotiations emerge again following death. We take this opportunity to highlight and briefly summarize ten of the most important issues to keep in mind when assisting clients where…

was last modified: February 24th, 2021 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Access to Justice in COVID-19 – Counterpoint

February 24, 2021 at 6:55 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Access to justice? It is not controversial to say that there have been long standing issues with access to justice within our court system for clients. Even before COVID-19, the justice system was facing challenges for quite some time.  What is access to justice? There are a lot of variations and interpretations to what this means. Simply put- access to justice is an equal right to understand and participate in every situation where law is debated, created, found, organized, administered, interpreted and applied.   Having access to justice consists of having available options to prevent, address and resolve the legal problems…

was last modified: February 24th, 2021 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Access to Justice: Is this still an issue?

February 24, 2021 at 6:51 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

For this edition of the newsletter, we thought it important to write about the two perspectives that have emerged in regard to access to justice in light of the COVID-19 global pandemic. I will be writing from the perspective of technological advances which have potentially eradicated many of the access to justice issues that have plagued our system for decades. My colleague, Kayla Stephenson, will offer you the other perspective that suggests access to justice issues continue to prevail in our Family Justice System despite recent advances made as a result of this pandemic. What is access to justice? I…

was last modified: February 24th, 2021 by Tricia Wong
News & Updates

Black History Month: Equality Diversity and Inclusion

February 24, 2021 at 6:33 pm by Tricia Wong / 0

Black History Month is about honouring the enormous contributions that Black people have made, and continue to make, over the years in all sectors of society. It is about celebrating resilience, innovation, and determination to work towards a more inclusive and diverse Ontario—and Canada in which everyone has every opportunity to flourish. This February, we are honouring Black History Month and celebrating black history with this month`s theme:  Equality, Diversity and Inclusion at FDRIO. It is important that in our practice, that we are culturally competent when it comes to our profession in the ADR field. As FDRIO members, we…

was last modified: February 24th, 2021 by Tricia Wong

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  • FDRIO Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Help & FAQ

Copyright 2017 FDRIO

Search engine

Use this form to find things you need on this site